Archive for the ‘White people’ category

MSM diversity spin

November 10, 2012

As half the planet is now aware, the Republicans lost  the US Presidential election because they didn’t get enough Hispanics votes. And not for the first, time the MSM get’s it totally wrong.

The first thing to take into account is that American has a first-past-the-post voting system,  which means that it isn’t just how many votes a party gets that counts, but where they get them. Getting 99 percent of the vote in 10 states won’t win do you much good if you lose all the other states. As it happens, the Hispanic population is overwhelmingly concentrated in half a dozen states in the South West, while the swing states that decided the election have small Hispanic populations.

As Vdare contributor Washington Watcher points out, it wasn’t the Hispanic vote which lost the Republicans the election, but the low working class white vote in the key swing states like Iowa and Wisconsin. One of the reasons why poor whites didn’t vote for Romney is he’s a rich financier, and they’re scared he’ll cut their pensions and medical aid.

Sure the high Hispanic vote is an ominous trend, but it didn’t decide this particular election, and trying to pander to such ethnocentric voters is probably futile. Instead the Republican Party needs to think about how it can get more working class white votes, which probably means making economic comprimises, but not capitulating on immigration policy.

East v West

September 15, 2012

Two years after a major earthquake, the New Zealand city of Christchurch has only managed to rebuild a modestly sized suburban library, meanwhile the Chinese has shown the world they can assemble a 30-story hotel in 15 days.

Admittedly this is a kitset hotel which has been manufactured off-site (which makes you wonder why the world doesn’t produce more manufactured kitset buildings) but it shows China’s vigour and determination when it comes to getting things done.  In contrast, the paralysed West seems to over complicate everything it attempts.

Reversing the failure of the BNP

September 9, 2012

With the BNP now stagnating (if not imploding) it’s time to reconsider whether European-style populist politics are the way forward.

In demographic terms, the basic approach of the BNP has been to go after the working class white rump – those disgruntled whites who are feed up with the current establishment, but lack the means or opportunity to join those skilled or wealthy British whites who are fleeing overseas.

Unfortunately, there are a lot of limitations in focusing on the rump. Firstly it lacks money, secondly it lacks skills, and unlike the constituency of the centre left, it continues to shrink in the face of ongoing third world immigration engineered by the centre left.

If the BNP is going to attract more funding and talent, then it needs to become more appealing to more enterprising and wealthy voters and supporters, and to do this it needs to think outside the conventional nationalist box.

One of the contributing factors in Britain’s current predicament has been its decision to turn its back on the British Commonwealth and seek closer economic and political ties with Europe. But in doing so it’s created a lot of division between Britain and the white British Commonwealth.

Today, white Commonwealth (and other) citizens of British ancestry are shut out of Britain, while millions of non-white immigrants take their place. At the same time, white citizens in colonial countries are feeling increasingly apprehensive about becoming a minority in places which have been majority white for the last two centuries

If whites are indeed becoming a diaspora minority in the British Commonwealth, then, like the Jews and Chinese, they will need an indigenous homeland they turn to if things get too hostile on the periphery.

By easing work and residency requirements for persons of native British ancestry, the BNP could attract funding and support from outside Britain, particularly from whites in South Africa and resource rich Canada and Australia – the two nations which are increasingly becoming the economic engine room of the UK Commonwealth.

In addition to changing its immigration approach from a defensive stance to an offensive one, the BNP will also have to change its economic (and education) policies to appeal to more middle class voters – particularly those who are currently wasting their votes on the one trick pony UKIP. A good starting point would be look closely at the policies of other maverick nations like Israel and Switzerland.

In population terms, this “Israelification” of immigration policy could make Britain even more overcrowded, particularly in the short term, but given the desperate position in which Britain’s finds itself drastic political chemotherapy is essential.

White males and welfare

April 14, 2012

In Mala Fide contributor Columnist points out a big problem with the libertarian argument that men should oppose the welfare state.

He makes a good point that since most private sector companies have now signed on to the anti-male, anti-white agenda of the public sector, white males are in a very economically vulnerable situation in terms of employment. Therefore it isn’t in their interest to spurn welfare and downsize the welfare safety net.

In reply a Swedish commenter pointed out the welfare state is hardly a safe sanctuary for right-wing white males either.

So just what position should white males adopt in regard to welfare?

Given the uncertainty of the economy and the pervasive anti-male ideology which infects it, white males would indeed be foolish to call for an end to welfare per se. Few people can take their jobs for granted, and unemployment benefits can be an essential life line in times of uncertainty. Forget the Puritan masochism.

Having said that, I’m not a fully fledged nihilist how believes everyone should go and welfare and bring down the whole rotten system (well not quite yet anyway).

Welfare comes out of taxes paid by other people like you, so if you access welfare for self-indulgent reasons you’re also dragging down your own team. On the other hand if you do need it, take it and don’t get hung up about it. Unemployment benefits only account for a relatively small percentage of welfare spending. The lion’s share of welfare spending goes on families headed by solo mothers and pensioners.

Secondly, if you do go on welfare, don’t just waste your time, sleeping, drinking and playing video games, do something constructive. If you end up on welfare because you’ve been fired for political incorrectness and you have some anti-establishment magnum opus to write, by all means cash in your dole cheque and start typing.

Remember also that just because you support basic unemployment benefits doesn’t mean you have to support every insane feminist aspect of the hyper liberal welfare state.

Women shouldn’t be able to have multiple kids on welfare and saner governments (such as those in East Asia) don’t support such dysgenic insanity. There’s no contradiction between receiving a modest amount of welfare if you need it, and opposing extravagant welfare spending for those who stupidly or self-indulgently design their whole lives around it.

Declining masculinity

April 13, 2012

1970s middle class rock band

 

 

 

 

 

 

1980s middle class rock band

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contemporary middle class rock band

Why anti-racist drugs probably won’t work

March 10, 2012

A research story about a drug having anti-racist effects is currently getting a lot of mileage on the Internet.  Apparently some Oxford researchers have found that the beta blocker drug propranolol reduced sub-conscious racist responses in a recent study.

Not surprisingly, this has generated a lot of semi-serious comments about the possibility of liberal-fascist authorities popping such drugs in the water supply. However, just because ethnocentric people show more fearful responses to questions about racism does not mean (for better or worse) that beta blockers are going to make them less racist.

For a start, beta blockers don’t actually reduce fear per se, they only reduce the physical symptoms of fear. In other words, if say, a white guy who doesn’t like Black people sees a Black man with a machette, he’s still going to be just as fearful.

Beta blockers are popular for performance anxiety, because  those who are concerned about showing their fear through blushing, tremors, etc, have one less thing to worry about.  But this also means that blockers could potentially make people who are sub-consciously racist better at hiding their racial discomfort, which in some cases could actually make them more, not less racist.

Beta blockers also have negative side effects like fatigue and insomnia. Whatever, liberals say about racist whites, they still need whites as cash-cow taxpayers and indiscriminate use of such drugs would undermine white productivity – which is the same reason why they don’t want to  legalise marajuana – it’s bad for capitalism, and in a modern liberal society money is the only thing holding society together.

 

 

Aging whites v poor browns

November 16, 2011

Occidental Quarterly contributor Yggdrasil highlights what could turn out to be a fatal problem for today’s multicultural democracies – the aging white population and its inability to continue to subsidise low-income non-whites.

Since ‘burn baby burn’ in the 60s, we’ve seen numerous copycat instances of Blacks and Muslims rioting when they’ve faced high unemployment and a lack of white investment in non-white areas. Think of the UK riots of 1981, 2001 and 2011, the LA riots of 91, and the Paris riots of the 90s and 00s.

But, in each of these cases, the government has been able to ameliorate the situation by pumping taxpayer’s money into the disaffected areas.

Now western governments have much less room to maneuver. The aging white population will soon be consuming a far greater share of government resources while the number of income taxpayers is rapidly declining. This means there’s little money left over for governments to address the problems of low-income non-whites.

If the recent past is anything to go by, the prefered solution to this problem is likely to be further immigration from South and East Asia. While this may help to increase tax revenues, it presents another problem in that Asian immigrants will be competing for jobs with middle class whites in a slow-growing economy.

In the 1930s liberal democracy nearly collapsed when it proved unable to provide economic stability and jobs. In the 1980s the Soviet Union never recovered from a collapse in oil prices. Perhaps this time the retirement of the boomers will spell the end of liberal democracy.